Quantcast
Channel: EngineerZone: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 36216

#pragma no_partial_initialization diagnosis error

$
0
0

I have built a system which has a struct containing other structs, and several macros to initialize them with default values.

 

Initially the macros would fill the structs sequentially like this:

 

#define ACM_IIRFILT_DEFAULT_INIT_FOR_INCLUSION(_filterStatePtr, _filterStatePtrStage2) \

{\

   ACM_MODULE_INIT_PARTIAL( ACM_IIRFiltRenderFunction,\

         ACM_IIRFiltBypassFunction, ACMModuleRenderer, 1, \

         ACM_IIRFiltBypassFunction,NCHANNELS, NCHANNELS),\

   (void *)_filterStatePtr,\

   (void *)_filterStatePtrStage2,\

}\

 

Note: ACM_MODULE_INIT_PARTIAL is another macro for a struct contained in the first struct.

 

This worked fairly well, but as some of my structs grew large, I had trouble keeping all macro's in sync with the actual struct declarations,

and debugging errors in these macro's were difficult.

 

So I started using designated initializers, like in the rewritten example below:

 

#define ACM_IIRFILT_DEFAULT_INIT_FOR_INCLUSION(_filterStatePtr, _filterStatePtrStage2) \

{\

          .Module = ACM_MODULE_INIT_PARTIAL( ACM_IIRFiltRenderFunction,\

         ACM_IIRFiltBypassFunction, ACMModuleRenderer, 1, \

         ACM_IIRFiltBypassFunction,NCHANNELS, NCHANNELS),\

   .iir_states = (void *)_filterStatePtr,\

   .iir_statesStage2 = (void *)_filterStatePtrStage2,\

}\

 

And in order to further ensure that all members of my large structs were properly initialized I started using the pragma above (in the headline).

 

But in one case, I kept getting a diagnostic error for the initialization of one of these structs, and since all contained structs had the same macro I know almost for sure that none of those are partially initialized.

Still I get the error for the large struct, that it is being partially initialized.

 

I ended up for now with removing the pragma because I was almost sure the struct _is_ fully initialized, and needed to continue work elsewhere.

 

So my question is:

Does anyone know have any suggestions to what I could try to do to resolve this properly ?

 

Thanks

/Lars


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 36216

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>